返回
2DPCA versus PCA for face recognition
DOI:10.1007/s11771-015-2699-z.png)
摘要
En 中文
Dimensionality reduction methods play an important role in face recognition. Principal component analysis (PCA) and two-dimensional principal component analysis (2DPCA) are two kinds of important methods in this field. Recent research seems like that 2DPCA method is superior to PCA method. To prove if this conclusion is always true, a comprehensive comparison study between PCA and 2DPCA methods was carried out. A novel concept, called column-image difference (CID), was proposed to analyze the difference between PCA and 2DPCA methods in theory. It is found that there exist some restrictive conditions when 2DPCA outperforms PCA. After theoretical analysis, the experiments were conducted on four famous face image databases. The experiment results confirm the validity of theoretical claim.
Keyword:
face recognition
dimensionality reduction
2DPCA method
PCA method
column-image difference (CID)
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.4
论文数:
5.2K
被引数:
1.0W
机构
引用论文
Effects of stereoisomers of estradiol on food intake, body weight and hoarding behavior in female rats雌二醇立体异构体对雌性大鼠摄食、体重和囤积行为的影响
(2D)2PCA:: Two-directional two-dimensional PCA for efficient face representation and recognition(2D)2PCA:: 用于高效人脸表示和识别的双向二维PCA
NEUROCOMPUTING
IF6.5
Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition稀疏保持投影及其在人脸识别中的应用
PATTERN RECOGNITION
IF7.6

