.png){kind=icon}
返回
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1002/jrsm.12.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
There are two popular statistical models for meta-analysis, the fixed-effect model and the random-effects model. The fact that these two models employ similar sets of formulas to compute statistics, and sometimes yield similar estimates for the various parameters, may lead people to believe that the models are interchangeable. In fact, though, the models represent fundamentally different assumptions about the data. The selection of the appropriate model is important to ensure that the various statistics are estimated correctly. Additionally, and more fundamentally, the model serves to place the analysis in context. It provides a framework for the goals of the analysis as well as for the interpretation of the statistics. In this paper we explain the key assumptions of each model, and then outline the differences between the models. We conclude with a discussion of factors to consider when choosing between the two models. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Keyword:
meta-analysis
fixed-effect
random-effects
statistical models
research synthesis
systematic reviews
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.1
论文数:
844
被引数:
8.7K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容