.png){kind=icon}
返回
A comparative analysis of interface erosion tests
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11069-013-0620-3.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Interface erosion is one of the main phenomena in dams, dikes and their foundations which may increase their failure risk. In laboratories, the jet erosion test (JET) and the hole erosion test (HET) are commonly used for the evaluation of the sensibility of interface erosion of fine soils. The results are interpreted by two distinct methods that are valid for one test only. A new energy analysis of the tests is developed, relating the total eroded mass to the dissipated fluid energy, and a new erosion resistance index is proposed. Seven naturally occurring fine-grained soils, covering a large range of erodibility, are compacted with the Proctor protocol, and they are tested with the two devices. It was shown that by using the commonly used methods, the values of the erosion coefficient are systematically higher with the JET than with the HET and the HET critical shear stress is about fifty times higher than the JET critical shear stress. Thus, the relative soil classifications yielded by the two erodimeters are not exactly the same. Based on energy analysis, values of erosion resistance index are roughly the same for each tested soil with the two apparatuses and a single classification of soil erodibility is obtained.
Keyword:
Dams
Embankment
Interface erosion
Hole erosion test
Jet erosion test
Energy
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
9.6K
被引数:
2.8W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Physicians’ and Attorneys’ Beliefs and Attitudes Related to the Brain Disease Model of Addiction
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏