.png){kind=icon}
返回
A deep learning based sensor fusion method to diagnose tightening errors
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.015.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Modern smart assembly lines commonly include electric tools with built-in sensors to tighten safety-critical joints. These sensors generate data that are subsequently analyzed by human experts to diagnose potential tightening errors. Previous research aimed to automate the diagnosing process by developing diagnosing models based on tightening theory and calibration of the friction coefficient in specific lab setups. Generalizing these results is difficult and often unsuccessful since friction coefficients vary between lab and production environments. To overcome this problem, this paper presents a novel methodology that builds multi-label classification deep learning models for diagnosing tightening errors using production data. The proposed methodology comprises three key contributions, i.e., the Labrador method, the Model Combo (MoBo) framework, and a heuristic evaluation method. Labrador is an elastic deep learning based sensor fusion method that (1) uses feature encoders to extract features; (2) conducts data-level and/or feature-level sensor fusion in both time and frequency domains; and (3) performs multi-label classification to detect and diagnose tightening errors. MoBo is a configurable and modular framework that supports Labrador in identifying optimal feature encoders. With MoBo and Labrador, one can easily explore and design a bounded search space for sensor fusion strategies (SFSs) and feature encoders. In order to identify the optimal solution within the defined search space, this paper introduces a heuristic method. By evaluating the trade-off between machine learning (ML) metrics (e.g., accuracy, subset accuracy, and F1) and operational (OP) metrics (e.g., inference latency), the proposed method identifies the most suitable solution depending on the requirements of individual use cases. In the experimental evaluation, we adopt the proposed methodology to identify the most suitable multi -label classification solutions for diagnosing tightening errors. To optimize ML metrics, the identified solution achieved 99.69% accuracy, 93.39% subset accuracy, 97.39% F1, and 6.68ms inference latency. To optimize OP metrics, the identified solution achieved 99.66% accuracy, 92.65% subset accuracy, 97.28% F1, and 2.41ms inference latency.
Keyword:
Tightening error diagnosing
Smart manufacturing
Deep learning
CNN
Sensor data fusion
Multi-label classification
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
14.2
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W
机构
引用论文
DCNN for condition monitoring and fault detection in rotating machines and its contribution to the understanding of machine nature.png)
HELIYONOAAI
HELIYONIF3.6
OAAI分享收藏Experimental verification of the mechanisms causing stick-slip motion originating from relative decelerationWEAR
WEARIF6.1
PREAI
分享收藏Damage Detection and Level Classification of Roof Damage After Typhoon Faxai Based on Aerial Photo and Deep Learning基于航拍照片和深度学习的Faxai台风后顶板损伤检测与等级分类
OAAI
IF0
OAAI分享收藏Synthesis of n-type semiconducting diamond film using diphosphorus pentaoxide as the doping source以五氧化二磷为掺杂源合成n型半导体金刚石膜
PREAI
分享收藏“We are children like others”: Pathways to mental health and healing for children born of genocidal rape in Rwanda“我们像其他人一样是孩子”: 卢旺达种族灭绝强奸所生儿童的精神卫生和康复之路
PREAI
分享收藏Weld image deep learning-based on-line defects detection using convolutional neural networks for Al alloy in robotic arc welding基于卷积神经网络的铝合金机器人弧焊焊缝图像深度学习在线缺陷检测
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容