.png){kind=icon}
返回
A different causal perspective with Necessary Condition Analysis
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114618.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article delves deeper into the causal perspective of Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA). In contrast to traditional probabilistic sufficiency approaches in quantitative social science research about what will happen on average in a group of cases, NCA is interested in what will not occur in almost every case if a necessary condition is absent. Rooted in David Hume's theory of causation NCA explores factors that act as 'must-haves' or bottlenecks for the outcome. Operating from this necessity perspective, NCA functions deterministically (without exceptions) or non-deterministically (allowing exceptions). NCA can enrich theories and models in social science research by identifying essential factors. The article contributes to the literature by precisely describing the necessity causal perspective that is used in NCA, and by explaining how this is different from causal perspectives that are commonly used in social science research.
Keyword:
Necessity
Hume
Necessary Condition Analysis
NCA
Typicality
Causality
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
9.8
论文数:
1.0W
被引数:
8.7W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) Does Exactly What It Should Do When Applied Properly: A Reply to a Comment on NCA必要条件分析 (NCA) 正确应用时确实应该做的事情: 对NCA评论的回复OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Nutritional Practices of Elite Female Surfers during Training and Competition优秀女子冲浪者在训练和比赛中的营养实践
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容