arrow
返回

A framework for step-wise explaining how to solve constraint satisfaction problems

delete2021-11-01
delete10
delete
OA
AI
B
Bart Bogaerts
E
Emilio Gamba *
T
Tias Guns
DOI:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103550delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
We explore the problem of step-wise explaining how to solve constraint satisfaction problems, with a use case on logic grid puzzles. More specifically, we study the problem of explaining the inference steps that one can take during propagation, in a way that is easy to interpret for a person. Thereby, we aim to give the constraint solver explainable agency, which can help in building trust in the solver by being able to understand and even learn from the explanations. The main challenge is that of finding a sequence of simple explanations, where each explanation should aim to be as cognitively easy as possible for a human to verify and understand. This contrasts with the arbitrary combination of facts and constraints that the solver may use when propagating. We propose the use of a cost function to quantify how simple an individual explanation of an inference step is, and identify the explanation-production problem of finding the best sequence of explanations of a CSP. Our approach is agnostic of the underlying constraint propagation mechanisms, and can provide explanations even for inference steps resulting from combinations of constraints. In case multiple constraints are involved, we also develop a mechanism that allows to break the most difficult steps up and thus gives the user the ability to zoom in on specific parts of the explanation. Our proposed algorithm iteratively constructs the explanation sequence by using an optimistic estimate of the cost function to guide the search for the best explanation at each step. Our experiments on logic grid puzzles show the feasibility of the approach in terms of the quality of the individual explanations and the resulting explanation sequences obtained. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keyword:
Artificial intelligence
Constraint solving
Explanation
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Artificial Intelligence Review 封面图
Artificial Intelligence Review
IF:
13.9
论文数:
6.1K
被引数:
1.9W

机构

V
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
学者数:
1.4W
论文数: 1.3W
被引数: 129
引用论文

引用论文

Triad case study: Rattlesnake Creek
err2004-12-21
err0
errOAAI
errRobert L. Johnson; Lisa A. Durham; Craig R. Rieman; Janna E. Hummel
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models黑箱模型的解释方法综述
err2018-08-22
err2.5K
errOAAI
errGuidotti, Riccardo; Monreale, Anna; Ruggieri, Salvatore; Turin, Franco; Giannotti, Fosca; Pedreschi, Dino
err分享
err收藏
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI可解释人工智能 (XAI): 负责任人工智能的概念、分类、机遇和挑战
err2020-06-01
err3.9K
errOAAI
errBarredo Arrieta, Alejandro; Diaz-Rodriguez, Natalia; Del Ser, Javier; Bennetot, Adrien; Tabik, Siham; Barbado, Alberto; Garcia, Salvador; Gil-Lopez, Sergio; Molina, Daniel; Benjamins, Richard; Chatila, Raja; Herrera, Francisco
err分享
err收藏
Response to Nowell and Horstwood (2009)
err2009-07-01
err0
PREAI
errMichael Richards; Vaughan Grimes; Colin Smith; Tanya Smith; Katerina Harvati; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Panagiotis Karkanas; Eleni Panagopoulou
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容