arrow
返回

A hierarchical process-dissociation model

delete2008-01-01
delete70
PRE
AI
J
Jeffrey N. Rouder *
J
Jun Lu
R
Richard D. Morey
D
Dongchu Sun
P
Paul L. Speckman
DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.370delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
In fitting the process-dissociation model (L. L. Jacoby, 1991) to observed data, researchers aggregate outcomes across participant, items, or both. T. Curran and D. L. Hintzman (1995) demonstrated how biases from aggregation may lead to artifactual support for the model. The authors develop a hierarchical process-dissociation model that does not require aggregation for analysis. Most importantly, the Curran and Hintzman critique does not hold for this model. Model analysis provides for support of process dissociation-selective influence holds, and there is a dissociation in correlation patterns among participants and items. Items that are better recollected also elicit higher automatic activation. There is no correlation, however, across participants; that is, participants with higher recollection have no increased tendency toward automatic activation. The critique of aggregation is not limited to process dissociation. Aggregation distorts analysis in many nonlinear models, including signal detection, multinomial processing tree models, and strength models. Hierarchical modeling serves as a general solution for accurately fitting these psychological-processing models to data.
Keyword:
process dissociation
human memory
Bayesian hierarchical models
aggregation bias
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

J
Journal of Experimental Psychology-General
IF:
3.5
论文数:
2.9K
被引数:
1.6W

机构

A
American University
学者数:
1.9K
论文数: 2.1K
被引数: 3.1K
University of Missouri System 封面图
University of Missouri System
学者数:
3.0W
论文数: 2.7W
被引数: 75
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息