arrow
Return

A novel multi-task machine learning classifier for rare disease patterning using cardiac strain imaging data

delete2024-05-09
delete3
delete
OA
AI
N
Nanda K. Siva
Y
Yashbir Singh
Q
Quincy A. Hathaway
P
Partho P. Sengupta
N
Naveena Yanamala *
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-61201-4delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
To provide accurate predictions, current machine learning-based solutions require large, manually labeled training datasets. We implement persistent homology (PH), a topological tool for studying the pattern of data, to analyze echocardiography-based strain data and differentiate between rare diseases like constrictive pericarditis (CP) and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Patient population (retrospectively registered) included those presenting with heart failure due to CP (n = 51), RCM (n = 47), and patients without heart failure symptoms (n = 53). Longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strains/strain rates for left ventricular segments were processed into topological feature vectors using Machine learning PH workflow. In differentiating CP and RCM, the PH workflow model had a ROC AUC of 0.94 (Sensitivity = 92%, Specificity = 81%), compared with the GLS model AUC of 0.69 (Sensitivity = 65%, Specificity = 66%). In differentiating between all three conditions, the PH workflow model had an AUC of 0.83 (Sensitivity = 68%, Specificity = 84%), compared with the GLS model AUC of 0.68 (Sensitivity = 52% and Specificity = 76%). By employing persistent homology to differentiate the pattern of cardiac deformations, our machine-learning approach provides reasonable accuracy when evaluating small datasets and aids in understanding and visualizing patterns of cardiac imaging data in clinically challenging disease states.
Keywords:
Echocardiography
Machine learning
Constrictive pericarditis
Restrictive cardiomyopathy
Rare disease
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Scientific Reports cover
Scientific Reports
IF:
3.9
Papers:
27.4W
Citations:
83.5W

Organization

R
rutgers university system
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.7W
Citations: 53
W
West Virginia University
Scholars:
1.4W
Papers: 1.1W
Citations: 1.2W