.png){kind=icon}
返回
A rules based algorithm to generate problem lists using emergency department medication reconciliation
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.06.008.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a problem list automatically generated from the emergency department (ED) medication reconciliation. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted via the ED who also had a prior inpatient admission within the past year of an academic tertiary hospital. Our algorithm used the First Databank ontology to group medications into therapeutic classes, and applied a set of clinically derived rules to them to predict obstructive lung disease, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), and thromboembolism (TE) risk. This prediction was compared to problem lists in the last discharge summary in the electronic health record (EHR) as well as the emergency attending note. Results: A total of 603 patients were enrolled from 03/29/2013-04/30/2013. The algorithm had superior sensitivity for all five conditions versus the attending problem list at the 99% confidence level (Obstructive Lung Disease 0.93 vs 0.47, Hypertension 0.93 vs 0.56, Diabetes 0.97 vs 0.73, TE Risk 0.82 vs 0.36, CHF 0.85 vs 0.38), while the attending problem list had superior specificity for both hypertension (0.76 vs 0.94) and CHF (0.87 vs 0.98). The algorithm had superior sensitivity for all conditions versus the EHR problem list (Obstructive Lung Disease 0.93 vs 0.34, Hypertension 0.93 vs 0.30, Diabetes 0.97 vs 0.67, TE Risk 0.82 vs 0.23, CHF 0.85 vs 0.32), while the EHR problem list also had superior specificity for detecting hypertension (0.76 vs 0.95) and CHF (0.87 vs 0.99). Conclusion: The algorithm was more sensitive than clinicians for all conditions, but less specific for conditions that are not treated with a specific class of medications. This suggests similar algorithms may help identify critical conditions, and facilitate thorough documentation, but further investigation, potentially adding alternate sources of information, may be needed to reliably detect more complex conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Clinical decision support
Meaningful use
Quality assurance
Emergency medicine
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
4.1
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.1W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Computerized physician order entry of medications and clinical decision support can improve problem list documentation compliance计算机化的医嘱输入药物和临床决策支持可以改善问题列表文档的合规性
PREAI
分享收藏
1.48-kV enhancement-mode AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors fabricated on 6-in. silicon by fluoride-based plasma treatment1. 采用氟化物基等离子体处理技术在6英寸硅片上制备的1.48-kV增强型AlGaN/GaN高电子迁移率晶体管
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容