arrow
返回

A simulation study on missing data imputation for dichotomous variables using statistical and machine learning methods

delete2023-06-09
delete8
delete
OA
AI
Y
Yingfeng Ge
Z
Zhiwei Li
J
Jinxin Zhang *
DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-36509-2delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
The problem of missing data, particularly for dichotomous variables, is a common issue in medical research. However, few studies have focused on the imputation methods of dichotomous data and their performance, as well as the applicability of these imputation methods and the factors that may affect their performance. In the arrangement of application scenarios, different missing mechanisms, sample sizes, missing rates, the correlation between variables, value distributions, and the number of missing variables were considered. We used data simulation techniques to establish a variety of different compound scenarios for missing dichotomous variables and conducted real-data validation on two real-world medical datasets. We comprehensively compared the performance of eight imputation methods (mode, logistic regression (LogReg), multiple imputation (MI), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)) in each scenario. Accuracy and mean absolute error (MAE) were applied to evaluating their performance. The results showed that missing mechanisms, value distributions and the correlation between variables were the main factors affecting the performance of imputation methods. Machine learning-based methods, especially SVM, ANN, and DT, achieved relatively high accuracy with stable performance and were of potential applicability. Researchers should explore the correlation between variables and their distribution pattern in advance and prioritize machine learning-based methods for practical applications when encountering dichotomous missing data.
Keyword:
MULTIPLE IMPUTATION
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Scientific Reports 封面图
Scientific Reports
IF:
3.9
论文数:
28.0W
被引数:
83.5W

机构

S
Sun Yat Sen University
学者数:
9.9W
论文数: 7.2W
被引数: 95
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
When More Yields Less: Speaking and Writing Deficits in Nonfluent Progressive Aphasia
err2004-04-01
err0
PREAI
errNaida L. Graham; Karalyn Patterson; John R. Hodges
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容