.png){kind=icon}
返回
A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.3389/fnins.2014.00405.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Various methods have been proposed to characterize the functional connectivity between nodes in a network measured with different modalities ( electrophysiology, functional magnetic resonance imaging etc.). Since different measures of functional connectivity yield different results for the same dataset, it is important to assess when and how they can be used. In this work, we provide a systematic framework for evaluating the performance of a large range of functional connectivity measures-based upon a comprehensive portfolio of models generating measurable responses. Specifically, we benchmarked 42 methods using 10,000 simulated datasets from 5 different types of generative models with different connectivity structures. Since all functional connectivity methods require the setting of some parameters (window size and number, model order etc.), we first optimized these parameters using performance criteria based upon (threshold free) ROC analysis. We then evaluated the performance of the methods on data simulated with different types of models. Finally, we assessed the performance of the methods against different levels of signal-to-noise ratios and network configurations. A MATLAB toolbox is provided to perform such analyses using other methods and simulated datasets.
Keyword:
functional connectivity
evaluation framework
neural mass models
fMRI
Granger causality
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.2
论文数:
1.6W
被引数:
5.3W
机构
引用论文
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks人类的大脑本质上是组织成动态的，反相关的功能网络OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏Intra-Individual Variability in Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Aging: Definitions, Context, and Effect Sizes.png)
PLoS ONEOAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容