.png){kind=icon}
返回
A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1177/1088868320931366.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
In recent years, psychology has wrestled with the broader implications of disappointing rates of replication of previously demonstrated effects. This article proposes that many aspects of this pattern of results can be understood within the classic framework of four proposed forms of validity: statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, construct validity, and external validity. The article explains the conceptual logic for how differences in each type of validity across an original study and a subsequent replication attempt can lead to replication failure. Existing themes in the replication literature related to each type of validity are also highlighted. Furthermore, empirical evidence is considered for the role of each type of validity in non-replication. The article concludes with a discussion of broader implications of this classic validity framework for improving replication rates in psychological research.
Keyword:
research methods
replication
statistical conclusion validity
construct validity
internal validity
external validity
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7.8
论文数:
521
被引数:
2.8K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Frailty and surgical outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer: Integration of geriatric assessment and prehabilitation into surgical practice for vulnerable patients胃肠癌的虚弱和手术结果: 将老年评估和康复纳入易受伤害患者的手术实践中
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings许多实验2: 调查样本和设置之间的可复制性差异OAAI
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容