.png){kind=icon}
返回
Academic Evaluation: Universal Instrument? Tool for Development?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11024-016-9306-9.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Research agendas and academic evaluation are inevitably linked. By means of economic incentives, promotion, research funding, and reputation academic evaluation is a powerful influence on the production of knowledge; moreover, it is often conceived as a universal instrument without consideration of the context in which it is applied. Evaluation systems are social constructions in dispute, being the current focus of international debates regarding criteria, indicators, and their associated methods. A universalist type of productivity indicators is gaining centrality in academic evaluation with profound effects on the content of research that is conducted everywhere. Specifically, evaluation systems based on this type of indicators are sending negative signals to scientists willing to conduct research on contextualized agendas, particularly those negotiated with non scientists. On the basis of theoretical and empirical studies documented on the specialized literature and extensive personal engagement with university research policy in Uruguay, we argue that the consolidation of evaluation practices of alleged universal validity deteriorates and discourages a type of research which is undeniably important in developing contexts.
Keyword:
Academic evaluation
Research agendas
Research for development
Science in developing countries
Uruguay
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.2
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
1.6K
机构
引用论文
Observations of upper ocean sound-speed structures in the North Pacific and their effects on long-range acoustic propagation at low and mid-frequencies北太平洋上层海洋声速结构的观测及其对低频和中频远程声传播的影响
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises.png)
SCIENTOMETRICS
SCIENTOMETRICSIF3.5
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容