arrow
返回

Accessible authentication: Assessing the applicability for users with disabilities

delete2022-02-01
delete7
delete
OA
AI
S
Steven Furnell *
K
Kirsi Helkala
N
Naomi Woods
DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102561delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Access to the many benefits available from digital technology can often vary depending upon the capabilities and facilities of the individual who is attempting to engage with it. Many digital devices and services require us to be identified and so require some form of user authentication as part of the process. However, the authentication methods that are currently dominant can prove difficult to use and do not meet the needs of users with disabilities. As such, they can constitute an additional barrier that is not faced by other users. This paper presents an assessment of different forms of user authentication (including various forms of secret, token and biometric approaches) against a range of potential disability categories that may affect their suitability for related user communities. The study draws upon disability classification identified by the World Health Organization and analyzes how the usability and/or security of current authentication methods fail users with disabilities due to their non-inclusive design. The discussion is based upon a combination of literature review and examination of real-life examples, and identifies aspects of current implementations that can cause problems in different scenarios. The findings suggest that biometric approaches are likely to be more directly applicable without incurring additional overheads, although even here the potential usability impacts are more prominent for some forms of disability. It is further recognised that while some methods can be made more accessible via assistive technologies, the primary aim should be for authentication choices to be as inclusive as possible by default, rather than expecting or requiring that some user groups should face an additional challenge to accessibility. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

C
Computers and Security
IF:
5.4
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.4W

机构

N
norwegian defence university college
学者数:
40
论文数: 31
被引数: 0
U
university of jyvaskyla
学者数:
6.3K
论文数: 6.8K
被引数: 12
U
University of Nottingham
学者数:
3.4W
论文数: 3.2W
被引数: 5.5W
学者 查看更多机构
引用论文

引用论文

Reduced Dose Ibrutinib Due to Financial Toxicity in CLL
err2018-09-08
err0
errOAAI
errDeepesh P. Lad; Pankaj Malhotra; Alka Khadwal; Gaurav Prakash; Arihant Jain; Subhash Varma
err分享
err收藏
CHANGES IN THE CHARACTERISTICS OF ROHU FISH (LABEO ROHITA) SAUSAGE DURING STORAGE AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES
err2008-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errTHERUVATHIL K. SINI; SETHUMADHAVAN SANTHOSH; AZHIKKAKATH C. JOSEPH; CHANDRAGIRI N. RAVISANKAR
err分享
err收藏
Idiopathic senile gait disorders are signs of subclinical disease
err2015-04-27
err74
PREAI
errBloem, BR; Gussekloo, J; Lagaay, AM; Remarque, EJ; Haan, J; Westendorp, RGJ
err分享
err收藏
The use of tobacco tax revenues to fund the Guam Cancer Registry: A double win for cancer control
err2017-06-01
err0
errOAAI
errAnnette M. David; Robert L. Haddock; Renata Bordallo; Janet T. Dirige; Les Mery
err分享
err收藏
Gastric adenocarcinoma in Zambia: A case-control study of HIV, lifestyle risk factors, and biomarkers of pathogenesis
err2013-02-19
err0
errOAAI
errV Kayamba; A W Asombang; V Mudenda; M M Lisulo; E Sinkala; S Mwanamakondo; I Mweemba; P Kelly
err分享
err收藏
没有更多内容