.png){kind=icon}
返回
Achieving Methodological Alignment When Combining QCA and Process tracing in Practice
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1177/0049124117701475.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article explores the practical challenges one faces when combining qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and process tracing (PT) in a manner that is consistent with their underlying assumptions about the nature of causal relationships. While PT builds on a mechanism-based understanding of causation, QCA as a comparative method makes claims about counterfactual causal relationships. Given the need to ensure alignment between the ontological understandings of causation that underlie a method and methodological practice, the different ontological foundations result in methodological guidelines that contradict each other, forcing the analyst to choose whether to be more in alignment with one or the other method. This article explores the implications of contrasting guidelines in a practical case study, where a QCA for sufficiency is followed by two PT case studies of positive cases.
Keyword:
QCA
process tracing
alignment
case selection
congruence
mechanisms
counterfactuals
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
S
IF:
6.5
论文数:
1.2K
被引数:
8.6K
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏<p>Safety and efficacy assessment of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and arterioportal shunt: a single-center experience</p>经动脉化疗栓塞术中使用药物洗脱微球对伴有肝动脉-门静脉分流的患者进行肝细胞癌的安全性和有效性评估：一项单中心经验OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: Agency relations and problems of oversight
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容