arrow
返回

Achieving operational process safety via model predictive control

delete2018-05-01
delete12
delete
OA
AI
F
Fahad Albalawi
H
Helen Durand
A
Anas Alanqar
P
Panagiotis D. Christofides *
DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.021delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Model predictive control (MPC) has been widely adopted in the chemical and petrochemical industry due to its ability to account for actuator constraints and multi-variable interactions for complex processes. However, closed-loop stability is not guaranteed within the framework of MPC without additional constraints or assumptions. An MPC formulation that can guarantee closed-loop stability in the presence of uncertainty is Lyapunov-based model predictive control (LMPC) which incorporates stability constraints based on a stabilizing Lyapunov-based controller. Though LMPC drives the closed-loop state trajectory to a steady-state, it lacks the ability to adjust the rate at which the closed-loop state approaches the steady-state in an explicit manner. However, there may be circumstances in which it would be desirable, for safety reasons, to be able to adjust this rate to avoid triggering of safety alarms or process shut-down. In addition, there may be scenarios in which the current region of operation is no longer safe to operate within, and another region of operation (i.e., a region around another steady-state) is appropriate. Motivated by these considerations, this work develops two novel LMPC schemes that can drive the closed-loop state to a safety region (a level set within the stability region where process functional safety is ensured) at a prescribed rate or can drive the closed-loop state to a safe level set within the stability region of another steady-state. Recursive feasibility and closed-loop stability are established for a sufficiently small LMPC sampling period. A comparison between the proposed method, which effectively integrates feedback control and safety considerations, and the classical LMPC method is demonstrated with a chemical process example. The chemical process example demonstrates that the safety-LMPC drives the closed-loop state into a safe level set of the stability region two sampling times faster than under the classical LMPC in the presence of process uncertainty. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Model predictive control
Chemical processes
Process control
Process functional safety
Process operation
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 封面图
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
IF:
4.2
论文数:
4.6K
被引数:
1.1W

机构

U
university of california los angeles
学者数:
5.3W
论文数: 4.2W
被引数: 89
University of California System 封面图
University of California System
学者数:
37.7W
论文数: 33.8W
被引数: 6.6K
引用论文

引用论文

Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review
err2010-01-15
err313
PREAI
errDunjo, Jordi; Fthenakis, Vasilis; Vilchez, Juan A.; Arnaldos, Josep
err分享
err收藏
Development of an inherent safety index based on fuzzy logic
err2004-04-16
err74
PREAI
errGentile, M; Rogers, WJ; Mannan, MS
err分享
err收藏
Improved Predictions of Alarm and Safety System Performance Through Process and Operator Response-Time Modeling
err2016-07-27
err6
PREAI
errMoskowitz, Ian H.; Seider, Warren D.; Arbogast, Jeffrey E.; Oktem, Ulku G.; Pariyani, Ankur; Soroush, Masoud
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Constructive nonlinear control: a historical perspective
err2001-05-01
err647
PREAI
errKokotovic, P; Arcak, M
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Feast AND Famine: A Statewide Science Serial Collection Assessment in Illinois
err2007-11-01
err0
errOAAI
errKaren Schmidt; Tina E. Chrzastowski; Chew Chiat Naun; Michael Norman
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容