.png){kind=icon}
返回
Adding The Patient Perspective To Comparative Effectiveness Research
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0660.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Comparative effectiveness research generates evidence that helps consumers, clinicians, purchasers, and policy makers make better decisions about health care. Capturing the patient's perspective is central to this research because it provides a complete picture of treatment impact. This can be done with standardized questionnaires that ask patients to report on their functioning, well-being, symptoms, and satisfaction with care. These data, however, are not collected routinely in either clinical research or practice. Strategies and incentives to link patient-reported outcomes to data from conventional sources-including clinical research, electronic health records, and administrative data-will accelerate the development of useful evidence.
Keyword:
QUALITY-OF-LIFE
NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE
REPORTED OUTCOMES
CLINICAL-TRIALS
CHALLENGES
POLICY
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
8.1
论文数:
9.9K
被引数:
1.9W
机构
引用论文
分享收藏Quality of life assessment comes of age in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.png)
AIDS
OAAI
AIDSIF3.1
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容