.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Advances in Underground Gas Storage: A Review of Current Practices and Future Prospects
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
S
M
D
H
N
M
DOI：10.1016/j.petlm.2026.04.017.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• UGS main reservoir options are depleted reservoirs, salt caverns, and aquifers • UHS requires enhanced well integrity and CCS requires geochemical stability • Simulations/ intelligent models are needed for UGS subsurface-property predictions • Depleted reservoirs are cost-effective but salt caverns provide high deliverability • Aquifers for UGS involve more risks and require regulatory support to justify them
Keywords:
Underground gas storage (UGS)
Evolution of UGS technologies
Drilling and completion
Depleted reservoirs
Aquifers
Salt caverns
Low-carbon future
UGS cost-benefit analysis
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.5
Papers:
378
Citations:
1.9K
Organization
Cited Papers