arrow
Return

Affinity Contrastive Learning for Skeleton-Based Human Activity Understanding

delete2026-03-01
delete0
PRE
AI
H
Hongda Liu
Y
Yunfan Liu
M
Min Ren
L
Lin Sui
Y
Yunlong Wang
Z
Z. T. Sun *
DOI:10.1109/TBIOM.2026.3652637delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
In skeleton-based human activity understanding, existing methods often adopt the contrastive learning paradigm to construct a discriminative feature space. However, many of these approaches fail to exploit the structural inter-class similarities and overlook the impact of anomalous positive samples. In this study, we introduce ACLNet, an Affinity Contrastive Learning Network that explores the intricate clustering relationships among human activity classes to improve feature discrimination. Specifically, we propose an affinity metric to refine similarity measurements, thereby forming activity superclasses that provide more informative contrastive signals. A dynamic temperature schedule is also introduced to adaptively adjust the penalty strength for various superclasses. In addition, we employ a margin-based contrastive strategy to improve the separation of hard positive and negative samples within classes. Extensive experiments on NTU RGB+D 60, NTU RGB+D 120, Kinetics-Skeleton, PKU-MMD, FineGYM, and CASIA-B demonstrate the superiority of our method in skeleton-based action recognition, gait recognition, and person re-identification. The source code is available at https://github.com/firework8/ACLNet
Keywords:
Contrastive learning
Skeleton
Biometrics
Semantics
Artificial intelligence
Temperature measurement
Measurement
Gait recognition
Feature extraction
Writing
Human activity understanding
skeleton
graph convolutional networks
contrastive learning

Journal

I
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMETRICS, BEHAVIOR, AND IDENTITY SCIENCE
IF:
0
Papers:
67
Citations:
0

Organization

U
university of chinese academy of sciences, cas
Scholars:
4.1W
Papers: 3.8W
Citations: 75
C
chinese academy of sciences
Scholars:
56.0W
Papers: 44.7W
Citations: 704