.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
AI adoption divergence and ESG: rethinking corporate financialization and financial performance
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
M
F
N
Y
Z
Y
DOI：10.1080/23311975.2026.2627662.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
This study explores the impact of financialization based on assets, debt, and income on the financial performance of Chinese non-financial listed firms in the A-share market, using a sample of 40,365 firm-year observations from 2010 to 2023. We applied fixed-effects, two-stage least squares models (IV-2SLS) using instrumental variables, and PSM-DID models, demonstrating that financialization based on assets and debt has a significantly negative impact on firm profitability. Financialization based on income, however, does not have a significant effect. Using signalling theory, agency theory, and resource-based views, the study also develops an integrated framework whereby divergence in the discourse surrounding AI and actual AI adoption (primary mechanism) is moderated, and ESG practice (secondary mechanism) mediates the effects of financialization on performance. The findings show that those firms that have a greater divergence between AI discourse and AI expenditure have lower financial performance, while superior ESG practice ameliorates the negative effects of financialization. Overall, the findings show that excessive financialization is associated with adverse performance outcomes, and the firm’s AI capability and ESG practice represent strategic forms of corporate performance.
Keywords:
Corporate financialization
financial performance
AI adoption divergence
ESG practice
Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility & Business Ethics
Risk Management
G31
G32
G34
L25
M14
Q56
Journal
C
IF:
0
Papers:
8
Citations:
0
Organization
Cited Papers