arrow
返回

Alienation, equality, and multifaith establishment

delete2025-02-01
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Andrew Shorten *
DOI:10.1111/ajps.12950delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Religious establishment today often takes a multifaith form, whereby multiple religions are supported in different ways and to different degrees. In order to contribute to the development of a normative framework for assessing practices and regimes of multifaith establishment, this article recommends the concept of social alienation. Initially, social alienation is defended as a negative normative criterion to determine when specific establishment practices are unacceptable. This criterion is compared favorably with approaches that evaluate establishment practices by reference to an ideal of public reason or according to whether they convey an expressive harm, as well as with similar approaches based on a purely subjective understanding of alienation. Subsequently, it is also argued that addressing social alienation can support a case for multifaith religious establishment regimes that support or recognize minority religions, since it is often unequal establishment practices that socially alienate, not establishment as such.
Keyword:
POLITICAL LIBERALISM
SEPARATION
RELIGION
STATE
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

American Journal of Political Science 封面图
American Journal of Political Science
IF:
5.6
论文数:
2.7K
被引数:
1.6W

机构

U
University of Limerick
学者数:
7.4K
论文数: 6.6K
被引数: 7.4K
引用论文

引用论文

Immersive Learning Frameworks: A Systematic Literature Review沉浸式学习框架:一项系统文献综述
err2023-10-01
err0
errOAAI
errFilipe Arantes Fernandes; Claudia Susie Camargo Rodrigues; Eldânae Nogueira Teixeira; Cláudia M. L. Werner
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
New drug treatments for alcohol problems: a critical appraisal
err2006-01-24
err0
PREAI
errJOANNA MONCRIEFF; D. COLIN DRUMMOND
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容