arrow
返回

Alternative testing methodologies for ecotoxicity

delete1998-04-01
delete25
delete
OA
AI
C
C.H. Walker
K
Klaus Kaiser
W
Werner Klein
L
Laurent Lagadic
D
David B. Peakall
S
Steven R. Sheffield
T
Thomas Soldan
M
Masayuki Yasuno
DOI:10.2307/3433793delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
There is growing public pressure to minimize the use of vertebrates in ecotoxicity testing; therefore, effective alternatives to toxicity tests causing suffering are being sought. This report discusses alternatives and differs in some respects from the reports of the other three groups because the primary concern is with harmful effects of chemicals at the level of population and above rather than with harmful effects upon individuals. It is concluded that progress toward the objective of minimizing testing that causes suffering would be served by the following initiatives-a clearer definition of goals acid strategies when undertaking testing procedures; development of alternative assays, including in vitro test systems, that are based on new technology; development of nondestructive assays for vertebrates (e.g., biomarkers) that do not cause suffering, selection of most appropriate species, strains, and developmental stages for testing procedures (but no additional species for basic testing); better integrated and more flexible testing procedures incorporating biomarker responses, ecophysiological concepts, and ecological end points (progress in this direction depends upon expert judgment). In general, testing procedures could be made more realistic, taking into account problems with mixtures, and with volatile or insoluble chemicals.
Keyword:
risk assessment
alternative methods
toxicology
ecotoxicology
in vitro methods
reduction
refinement
replacement
testing
biomarkers
sentinels
wildlife
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Environmental Health Perspectives 封面图
Environmental Health Perspectives
IF:
9.8
论文数:
1.1W
被引数:
4.0W

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

暂无论文信息