arrow
Return

An in silico guide for ventriculo-ventricular delay programming for left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy

delete2025-05-21
delete0
delete
OA
AI
S
Strocchi, Marina *
A
Akriti Naraen
N
Nadine Ali
M
Matthew Shun‐Shin
K
Karli Gillette
C
Christopher A. Rinaldi
A
Ahran Arnold
G
Gernot Plank
E
Edward J. Vigmond
Z
Zachary I. Whinnett
S
Steven Niederer
DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf089delete
deleteOriginal
deleteOriginal request for help
deleteShare
deleteSave
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Aims Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP)-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) can improve left ventricular (LV) activation when LBBP alone or conventional biventricular pacing are ineffective. However, the optimal programming settings for ventriculo-ventricular delay (VVD) for LOT-CRT are unknown. We aim to investigate how to optimally program VVD for LOT-CRT in the presence of various LV conduction substrates using computational modelling.Methods and results We simulated ventricular activation on 24 anatomies and validated the model against clinical data. Diffuse LV conduction system and intra-myocardial delay were simulated by slowing the conduction velocity of the LV His-Purkinje system and myocardium, respectively, alone or in combination with proximal left bundle branch block (LBBB). We simulated LOT-CRT with selective or myocardial capture (LV septal pacing, LVSP) with VVD ranging between -100 ms (LBBP/LVSP ahead) and +100 ms [LV epicardial lead (LVepiP), ahead]. Response was quantified with 95% LV activation times (LVAT95). In the presence of diffuse LV conduction system delay, the optimal VVD for LOT-CRT was always negative (LBBB: -42.5 +/- 6.6 ms; no LBBB: -36.2 +/- 5.6 ms), as delivering LBBP ahead of LVepiP compensates for the slow LV His-Purkinje. In the presence of LV intra-myocardial disease, the shortest LVAT95 with LOT-CRT was achieved by pacing the coronary sinus LV first (optimal VVD for LBBB: 23.3 +/- 8.5 ms; no LBBB: 79.2 +/- 18.0 ms). The type of capture for LOT-CRT affected the optimal VVD, with myocardial capture favouring negative VVDs (LVSP ahead).Conclusion The optimal VVD for LOT-CRT depends on the mechanism of delayed LV activation and type of capture achieved, highlighting the importance of VVD optimization.
Keywords:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
Ventriculo-ventricular delay
Conduction substrate
Conduction system pacing
Computational model

Journal

E
Europace
IF:
7.4
Papers:
7.7K
Citations:
1.6W

Organization

G
Guys and St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust
Scholars:
408
Papers: 337
Citations: 78
M
Med Univ Graz
Scholars:
599
Papers: 279
Citations: 97
A
alan turing institute
Scholars:
158
Papers: 118
Citations: 32
U
Univ Utah
Scholars:
2.0K
Papers: 1.4K
Citations: 436
U
Univ Bordeaux
Scholars:
1.4K
Papers: 584
Citations: 192
researcher View more organizations