arrow
返回

Analogy in Inflection

delete2024-01-16
delete1
delete
OA
AI
E
Emily Lindsay‐Smith
M
Matthew Baerman
S
Sacha Beniamine
H
Helen Sims‐Williams
E
Erich R. Round *
DOI:10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-040935delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Analogy has returned to prominence in the field of inflectional morphology as a basis for new explanations of inflectional productivity. Here we review the rising profile of analogy, identifying key theoretical and methodological developments, areas of success, and priorities for future work. In morphological theory, work within so-called abstractive approaches places analogy at the center of productive processes, though significant conceptual and technical details remain to be settled. The computational modeling of inflectional analogy has a rich and diverse history, and attention is now increasingly directed to understanding inflectional systems through their internal complexity and cross-linguistic diversity. A tension exists between the prima facie promise of analogy to lead to new explanations and its relative lack of theoretical articulation. We bring this to light as we examine questions regarding inflectional defectiveness and whether analogy is reducible to grammar optimization resulting from simplicity biases in learning and language use.
Keyword:
analogy
inflection
productivity
abstractive morphology
modeling
defectiveness
grammar optimization

期刊

Annual Review of Linguistics 封面图
Annual Review of Linguistics
IF:
4.3
论文数:
235
被引数:
979

机构

U
University of Surrey
学者数:
1.2W
论文数: 1.3W
被引数: 22