.png){kind=icon}
返回
Are livable elements also restorative?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.003.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The present study examined whether three elements claimed by Whyte (1980) as making plazas more livable seating, triangulation, and food - also make plazas more restorative. We manipulated color slides of three plazas for the presence or absence of each element. Sixty participants (23 men, 37 women) rated each plaza, presented in random order, on a five-item restorativeness scale (PRS_5). The scale proved reliable, we found no gender differences in response and found that adding triangulation (sculpture) or adding both sculpture and seats to plazas improved restorativeness, but that plazas with all three elements had lower scores than plazas with two of them. These findings echoed earlier findings for livability. We also examined complexity, because it might affect fascination, preference, and thus restorativeness. Restorativeness and its items did not relate to restorativeness. We found that differences in perceived livability and restorativeness related to two restorative properties: fascination and coherence. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Stress
Fascination
Preference
Public space
Sittability
Public art
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
7
论文数:
3.0K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容