返回
Argumentation graphs with constraint-based reasoning for collaborative expertise
DOI:10.1016/j.future.2017.09.081.png)
摘要
En 中文
Collaborative processes are very important in telemedicine domain since they allow for making right decisions in complex situations with multidisciplinary staff. When modelling these collaborative processes, some inconsistencies can appear. In semantic modelling (conceptual graphs), these inconsistencies are verified using constraints. In this work, collaborative processes are represented using an argumentation system modelled in a conceptual graph formalism where inconsistencies could be particular bad attack relation between arguments. To overcome these inconsistencies, two solutions are proposed. The first one is to weight the arguments evolving in the argumentation system on the basis of the competencies of the health professionals and the credibility of the sources justifying their advice (arguments), and the second one is to model some law concepts as constraints in order to check their compliance of the collaborative process. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Argumentation theory
Decision making
Conceptual graphs
Inconsistencies
Weighting
Medical deontology
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
F
IF:
6.1
论文数:
6.9K
被引数:
2.3W
机构
引用论文
The Implementation and Appraisal of a Novel Confirmatory HIV-1 Testing Algorithm in the Microbicides Development Programme 301 Trial (MDP301)
PLoS ONE
IF0
The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea稻瘟病菌Magnaporthe grisea的基因组序列
Nature
IF0

