.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Argumentatively Navigating Deep Disagreements
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1111/phpr.70117.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
When disagreements cut deep, epistemic agents face a predicament. Although disagreements have been widely hailed for their epistemic benefits, deep disagreements are often plagued with argumentative hurdles preventing the attainment of such epistemic goods. This raises an important question: What should one do when faced with a deep disagreement? This article develops a case-sensitive framework to help epistemic agents tailor their argumentative course of action to the rich complexity of deep disagreements in hopes of yielding positive epistemic outcomes.
Keywords:
argumentation
deep disagreement
rational resolution
rational response
Journal
P
IF:
1.4
Papers:
56
Citations:
3.5K