.png){kind=icon}
返回
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.7326/ANNALS-24-00981.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of computer-aided detection (CADe) system-enhanced colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy suggest increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) and decreased adenoma miss rate (AMR), but the effect on detection of advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) is unclear. Purpose: To conduct a systematic review to compare performance of CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy. Data Sources: Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched through February 2024. Study Selection: Published RCTs comparing CADe-enhanced and conventional colonoscopy. Data Extraction: Average adenoma per colonoscopy (APC) and ACN per colonoscopy were primary outcomes. Adenoma detection rate, AMR, and ACN detection rate (ACN DR) were secondary outcomes. Balancing outcomes included withdrawal time and resection of nonneoplastic polyps (NNPs). Subgroup analyses were done by neural network architecture. Data Synthesis: Forty-four RCTs with 36 201 cases were included. Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have higher average APC (12 090 of 12 279 [0.98] vs. 9690 of 12 292 [0.78], incidence rate difference [IRD] = 0.22 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.28]) and higher ADR (7098 of 16 253 [44.7%] vs. 5825 of 15 855 [36.7%], rate ratio [RR] = 1.21 [CI, 1.15 to 1.28]). Average ACN per colonoscopy was similar (1512 of 9296 [0.16] vs. 1392 of 9121 [0.15], IRD = 0.01 [CI, -0.01 to 0.02]), but ACN DR was higher with CADe system use (1260 of 9899 [12.7%] vs. 1119 of 9746 [11.5%], RR = 1.16 [CI, 1.02 to 1.32]). Using CADe systems resulted in resection of almost 2 extra NNPs per 10 colonoscopies and longer total withdrawal time (0.53 minutes [CI, 0.30 to 0.77]). Limitation: Statistically significant heterogeneity in quality and sample size and inability to blind endoscopists to the intervention in included studies may affect the performance estimates. Conclusion: Computer-aided detection-enhanced colonoscopies have increased APC and detection rate but no difference in ACN per colonoscopy and a small increase in ACN DR. There is minimal increase in procedure time and no difference in performance across neural network architectures.
Keyword:
COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION
ADENOMA DETECTION
DETECTION SYSTEM
MULTICENTER
SURVEILLANCE
QUALITY
期刊
IF:
15.2
论文数:
4.2W
被引数:
6.5W
机构
引用论文
The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method用于随机效应荟萃分析的hartung-knapp-sidik-jonkman方法非常简单，并且大大优于标准的DerSimonian-Laird方法
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Vision-based smooth obstacle avoidance motion trajectory generation for autonomous mobile robots using Bézier curves基于视觉的b é zier曲线的自主移动机器人平滑避障运动轨迹生成
PREAI
分享收藏Reducing adenoma miss rate of colonoscopy assisted by artificial intelligence: a multicenter randomized controlled trial人工智能辅助结肠镜检查降低腺瘤漏检率的多中心随机对照试验
PREAI
分享收藏Usefulness of a novel computer-aided detection system for colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial新型计算机辅助检测系统对结直肠肿瘤的有效性: 一项随机对照试验
PREAI
分享收藏Impact of an artificial intelligence-aided endoscopic diagnosis system on improving endoscopy quality for trainees in colonoscopy: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study.png)
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY
OAAI
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPYIF4.7
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容