返回
Assessing natural global catastrophic risks
DOI:10.1007/s11069-022-05660-w.png)
摘要
En 中文
The risk of global catastrophe from natural sources may be significantly larger than previous analyses have found. In the study of global catastrophic risk (GCR), one line of thinking posits that deep human history renders natural GCRs insignificant. Essentially, the fact that natural hazards did not cause human extinction at any previous time makes it unlikely that they would do so now. This paper finds flaws in this argument, refines the theory of natural GCR, analyzes the space of natural GCRs, and presents implications for decision-making and research. The paper analyzes natural climate change, natural pandemics, near-Earth objects (asteroids, comets, and meteors), space weather (coronal mass ejections, solar flares, and solar particle events), stellar explosions (gamma-ray bursts and supernovae), and volcanic eruptions. Almost all natural GCR scenarios involve important interactions between the natural hazard and human civilization. Several natural GCR scenarios may have high ongoing probability. Deep human history provides little information about the resilience of modern global civilization to natural global catastrophes. The natural GCRs should not be dismissed on grounds of deep human history. Work on natural GCRs should account for their important human dimensions. A case can even be made for abandoning the distinction between natural and anthropogenic GCR.
Keyword:
Global catastrophic risk
Climate change
Pandemics
Near-earth objects
Space weather
Stellar explosions
Volcanic eruptions
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
3.7
论文数:
9.6K
被引数:
2.8W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
Long-term prospects: Mitigation of supernova and gamma-ray burst threat to intelligent beings
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA
IF3.4
Environmental perturbations caused by the impacts of asteroids and comets
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS
IF37.3

