.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Asset mispricing
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.05.011.png)
.png){kind=icon}
Original request for help.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
We use a unique sample of corporate bonds guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the US to test recent theories about why asset prices may diverge from fundamental values. A key feature of our study is access to proprietary data on the haircuts, funding costs, and inventory positions of the primary dealers making markets in the individual bonds. The results provide strong support for the cross-sectional implications of the safe-asset, intermediary-constraints, and search-frictions literatures. Furthermore, the results indicate that network topology may also play an important role in explaining mispricing. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Guaranteed bonds
Safe assets
Intermediary constraints
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
12
Papers:
3.8K
Citations:
5.5W