Authors' Reply

Tarak Nandy

doi:10.1109/JSEN.2022.3175591

Authors' Reply

2022-07-01

1

PRE

AI

T

Tarak Nandy *

M

Mohd Yamani Idna Idris

R

Rafidah Md Noor

A

Ainuddin Wahid Abdul Wahab

B

Bhattacharyya, Sananda

DOI：10.1109/JSEN.2022.3175591

原文链接

原文求助

摘要

En 中文

Communication in vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) is significantly increased due to several services such as location-based service (LBS), traffic management, road safety, and vehicle privacy. Authentication is one of the backbones for communication in the vehicular network to protect the whole system, and guarantee the unforgeability and effectiveness of various services. On this note, in the above article, Nandy et al. (2021) recently proposed a secure, privacy-preserving, and lightweight authentication scheme for VANET. Recently, Chaudhry (2022) comments on Nandy et al.' s article, discussing the private-public key pair, clogging attack, and the pseudo-identity uses. This note addresses the raised comment by the aforesaid author. Furthermore, the detailed clarification against all comments is discussed with the purpose of producing a clear understanding.

Keyword:

Authentication

elliptic curve cryptography (ECC)

privacy

security

vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET)

Authors' Reply

摘要

期刊

机构