Return
Bailout Stigma
DOI:10.1111/jofi.13386.png)
Abstract
En 中文
We develop a model of bailout stigma in which accepting a bailout signals a firm's balance-sheet weakness and reduces its funding prospects. To avoid stigma, high-quality firms withdraw from subsequent financing after receiving bailouts or refuse bailouts altogether to send a favorable signal. The former leads to a short-lived stimulation followed by a market freeze even worse than if there were no bailout. The latter revives the funding market, albeit with delay, to the level achievable without any stigma and implements a constrained optimal outcome. A menu of multiple bailout programs compounds bailout stigma and exacerbates the market freeze.
Keywords:
ADVERSE SELECTION
DISCOUNT WINDOW
FINANCIAL CRISIS
TRADING DYNAMICS
MARKET
INTERVENTIONS
INFORMATION
RELUCTANCE
BORROW
Journal
IF:
9.5
Papers:
4.0K
Citations:
5.0W

