.png){kind=icon}
返回
Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Generative Models
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev-statistics-040522-015915.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Bayesian inference is a powerful tool for combining information in complex settings, a task of increasing importance in modern applications. However, Bayesian inference with a flawed model can produce unreliable conclusions. This review discusses approaches to performing Bayesian inference when the model is misspecified, where, by misspecified, we mean that the analyst is unwilling to act as if the model is correct. Much has been written about this topic, and in most cases we do not believe that a conventional Bayesian analysis is meaningful when there is serious model misspecification. Nevertheless, in some cases it is possible to use a well-specified model to give meaning to a Bayesian analysis of a misspecified model, and we focus on such cases. Three main classes of methods are discussed: restricted likelihood methods, which use a model based on an insufficient summary of the original data; modular inference methods, which use a model constructed from coupled submodels, with some of the submodels correctly specified; and the use of a reference model to construct a projected posterior or predictive distribution for a simplified model considered to be useful for prediction or interpretation.
Keyword:
Bayesian modular inference
Bayesian model criticism
cutting feedback
likelihood-free inference
restricted likelihood
期刊
IF:
8.7
论文数:
211
被引数:
2.4K
机构
引用论文
Research on the Development Policy of Prefabricated Building based on asymmetric Evolutionary Game
OAAI
.png){kind=icon}
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容