arrow
返回

Behavioral test methods workshop

delete2005-05-01
delete25
PRE
AI
W
William Slikker *
K
Karen Acuff
W
William K. Boyes
J
John J. Chelonis
K
Kevin M. Crofton
G
George E. Dearlove
A
Abby Li
V
Virginia C. Moser
M
M. Christopher Newland
J
John Rossi
S
Susan Schantz
W
William F. Sette
L
Larry P. Sheets
M
Mark Stanton
S
Shelley Tyl
T
Thomas J. Sobotka
DOI:10.1016/j.ntt.2005.02.003delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
A one and a half day workshop on behavioral testing was conducted in order to discuss experimental procedures and practices that may help enhance the utility of behavioral data as a reliable index of neurotoxicity and in the safety evaluation of chemical substances. The workshop was open to participation by all sectors of the neuroscience community including academia, government, testing laboratories, and industry. The level of confidence with which changes in behavior can reliably signal adverse effects on the nervous system depends, in part, on the scientific quality of the data generated. With an emphasis on education and problem solving, the workshop focused on the practical aspects and scientific rationale underlying valid and high quality testing. In behavioral testing, there are numerous experimental factors that may impact on the quality of data. These include such elements as experimental design, selection of test methods, the care and precision in the conduct of behavioral testing, procedures to minimize bias and potential confounds, appropriateness of statistical analyses, and data interpretation. In plenary session investigators experienced in behavioral testing discussed the significance of these various experimental factors to data quality, outlined problematic issues, and presented a synopsis of approaches for addressing each of the factors as outlined in a draft of a primer developed by the Interagency Committee on Neurotoxicology (ICON). During the remainder of the workshop, open discussions in small breakout groups were used to address the problematic issues identified by the plenary speakers and explore alternative approaches for dealing with them. Finally, all workshop participants were reconvened in plenary session for summation of breakout group discussions and final recommendations. Information from the workshop was used to form the basis of this manuscript and will be used to help finalize a behavioral test methods primer being drafted by the ICON. The overall conclusions from the workshop were that consensus can be reached on the fundamentals of behavioral assessment, and that aspects of behavioral assessment including experimental design, test method selection, training, validation, control of confounds, data variability, data analysis, and data interpretation need to be carefully considered in the planning and conduct of behavioral safety assessments. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
behavior
dose-response
experimental design
safety assessment
test method selection
training
validation
control of confounds
data variability
data analysis
data interpretation and risk assessment
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Neurotoxicology and Teratology 封面图
Neurotoxicology and Teratology
IF:
2.8
论文数:
250
被引数:
3.3K

机构

暂无机构信息
引用论文

引用论文

Synaptic proteins and phospholipids are increased in gerbil brain by administering uridine plus docosahexaenoic acid orally
err2006-05-01
err0
PREAI
errRichard J. Wurtman; Ismail H. Ulus; Mehmet Cansev; Carol J. Watkins; Lei Wang; George Marzloff
err分享
err收藏
Rapid Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Acute Myocardial Infarction by Echocardiographic Wall Motion Analysis
err1992-01-01
err0
PREAI
errJens Berning; Jens Rokkedal Nielsen; Jeppe Launbjerg; Jan Fogh; Hans Mickley; Poul Erik Andersen
err分享
err收藏
Methods to identify and characterize developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment. I: Behavioral effects
err2001-03-01
err58
errOAAI
errCory-Slechta, DA; Crofton, KM; Foran, JA; Ross, JF; Sheets, LP; Weiss, B; Mileson, B
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容