arrow
返回

Benchmarking proton RBE models

delete2024-04-08
delete6
delete
OA
AI
L
Lydia L Gardner *
J
John D. O’Connor
S
Stephen J. McMahon
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ad3329delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Objective. To biologically optimise proton therapy, models which can accurately predict variations in proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are essential. Current phenomenological models show large disagreements in RBE predictions, due to different model assumptions and differences in the data to which they were fit. In this work, thirteen RBE models were benchmarked against a comprehensive proton RBE dataset to evaluate predictions when all models are fit using the same data and fitting techniques, and to assess the statistical robustness of the models. Approach. Model performance was initially evaluated by fitting to the full dataset, and then a cross-validation approach was applied to assess model generalisability and robustness. The impact of weighting the fit and the choice of biological endpoint (either single or multiple survival levels) was also evaluated. Main results. Fitting the models to a common dataset reduced differences between their predictions, however significant disagreements remained due to different underlying assumptions. All models performed poorly under cross-validation in the weighted fits, suggesting that some uncertainties on the experimental data were significantly underestimated, resulting in over-fitting and poor performance on unseen data. The simplest model, which depends linearly on the LET but has no tissue or dose dependence, performed best for a single survival level. However, when fitting to multiple survival levels simultaneously, more complex models with tissue dependence performed better. All models had significant residual uncertainty in their predictions compared to experimental data. Significance. This analysis highlights that poor quality of error estimation on the dose response parameters introduces substantial uncertainty in model fitting. The significant residual error present in all approaches illustrates the challenges inherent in fitting to large, heterogeneous datasets and the importance of robust statistical validation of RBE models.
Keyword:
relative biological effectiveness
proton therapy
mathematical modelling

期刊

Physics in Medicine and Biology 封面图
Physics in Medicine and Biology
IF:
3.4
论文数:
1.4W
被引数:
3.1W

机构

U
Ulster University
学者数:
5.7K
论文数: 5.9K
被引数: 25
Q
Queen's University Belfast
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.7W
被引数: 2.5W
引用论文

引用论文

Report of the AAPM TG-256 on the relative biological effectiveness of proton beams in radiation therapy放射治疗中质子束相对生物学有效性的AAPM TG-256报告
err2019-02-14
err236
errOAAI
errPaganetti, Harald; Blakely, Eleanor; Carabe-Fernandez, Alejandro; Carlson, David J.; Das, Indra J.; Dong, Lei; Grosshans, David; Held, Kathryn D.; Mohan, Radhe; Moiseenko, Vitali; Niemierko, Andrzej; Stewart, Robert D.; Willers, Henning
err分享
err收藏
Clinical evidence of variable proton biological effectiveness in pediatric patients treated for ependymoma小儿室管膜瘤治疗中可变质子生物学有效性的临床证据
err2016-12-01
err222
errOAAI
errPeeler, Christopher R.; Mirkovic, Dragan; Titt, Uwe; Blanchard, Pierre; Gunther, Jillian R.; Mahajan, Anita; Mohan, Radhe; Grosshans, David R.
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
Efficacy of Metadoxine in the Management of Acute Alcohol Intoxication
err2002-02-01
err0
errOAAI
errMCLR Díaz Martínez; A Díaz Martínez; V Villamil Salcedo; C Cruz Fuentes
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容