.png){kind=icon}
返回
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
摘要
En 中文
Minimal winning coalitions have appeared as a key prediction or as an essential assumption of virtually all formal models of coalition formation, vote buying, and logrolling. Notwithstanding this research, we provide a model showing that supermajority coalitions may be cheaper than minimal winning coalitions. Specifically, if vote buyers move sequentially, and if the losing vote buyer is always granted a last chance to attack the winner's coalition, then minimal winning coalitions will generally not be cheapest, and equilibrium coalitions will generally not be minimal winning. We provide results relating equilibrium coalition size with preferences of the legislators and vote buyers, and we show that minimal winning coalitions should occur in only rare cases. We discuss these results in light of empirical work on coalition size and suggest other possible avenues for testing our model.
Keyword:
PERSPECTIVE
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.8
论文数:
8.7K
被引数:
2.1W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Dysfunctional inhibitory control in Parkinson’s disease patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesias.png)
PREAI
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容