.png){kind=icon}
返回
Calculating errors for measures derived from choice modelling estimates
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1016/j.trb.2011.10.008.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
The calibration of choice models produces a set of parameter estimates and an associated covariance matrix, usually based on maximum likelihood estimation. However, in many cases, the values of interest to analysts are in fact functions of these parameters rather than the parameters themselves. It is thus also crucial to have a measure of variance for these derived quantities and it is preferable that this can be guaranteed to have the maximum likelihood properties, such as minimum variance. While the calculation of standard errors using the Delta method has been described for a number of such measures in the literature, including the ratio of two parameters, these results are often seen to be approximate calculations and do not claim maximum likelihood properties. In this paper, we show that many measures commonly used in transport studies and elsewhere are themselves maximum likelihood estimates and that the standard errors are thus exact, a point we illustrate for a substantial number of commonly used functions. We also discuss less appropriate methods, notably highlighting the issues with using simulation for obtaining the variance of a function of estimates. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keyword:
Discrete choice models
Standard errors
Parameter significance
Delta method
Maximum likelihood
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
6.3
论文数:
3.5K
被引数:
1.9W
机构
引用论文
Assuring finite moments for willingness to pay in random coefficient models保证随机系数模型中支付意愿的有限矩.png)
TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATIONIF3.3
PREAI
分享收藏
没有更多内容
没有更多内容