.png){kind=icon}
返回
Can financial statement analysis beat consensus analysts' recommendations?
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1007/s11142-010-9124-5.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
We examine whether investors can exploit financial statement information to identify companies with a greater likelihood of future earnings increases and whether stocks of those companies generate 1-year abnormal returns that exceed the abnormal returns from following analysts' consensus recommendations. Our approach summarizes financial statement information into a predicted earnings increase score, which captures the likelihood of 1-year-ahead earnings increases. We find that, within our sample of consensus recommendations, stocks with high scores are much more likely to experience future earnings increases than stocks with low scores. A hedge portfolio strategy that utilizes our approach within each consensus recommendation level generates average annual abnormal returns of 10.9 percent over our 12-year sample period, after controlling for previously identified risk factors. These abnormal returns exceed those available from following analysts' consensus recommendations. Our results show that share prices and consensus recommendations fail to impound financial statement information that helps predict future earnings changes.
Keyword:
Earnings predictions
Financial statement analysis
Consensus recommendations
Abnormal returns
Sell side analysts
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
5.8
论文数:
1.1K
被引数:
6.4K
机构
引用论文
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns.png)
JOURNAL OF FINANCE
JOURNAL OF FINANCEIF9.5
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations?ACCOUNTING REVIEW
ACCOUNTING REVIEWIF4.4
PREAI
分享收藏The relative informativeness of analysts' stock recommendations and earnings forecast revisions
PREAI
分享收藏
查看更多内容