arrow
返回

Can transitioning to non-renewable modern energy decrease carbon dioxide emissions in India?

delete2022-09-01
delete4
PRE
AI
DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102733delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Traditional discussions of the relationships between energy, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and human development fail to expose within country energy and CO2 emissions inequality. This work seeks to elucidate these inequalities in India and then investigate the consequential impacts on welfare and CO2 emissions of India's transition away from energy poverty. The study uses the India Human Development Survey and the EORA database to generate household Human Development Index scores, consumption and CO2 emissions distributions for India in both 2005 and 2012. Results suggest that addressing pressing welfare issues connected to energy use in India, such as indoor air pollution from solid fuels, can be aided by a transition to modern energy carriers, with little consequential increase in CO2 emissions. The richest 10 % of Indians only emitted 20 % more emissions from direct primary energy use than the poorest 10 % in 2012 (excluding direct emissions from transport). However, the wealth creation needed to sustain a modern energy transition will inevitably coincide with increased consumption, consumption which is supported by carbon intensive electricity and materials and represents the fastest growth area for CO2 emissions as incomes rise. The richest 10 % of Indians emitted five times more emissions from indirect energy use than the poorest 10 % in 2012. Addressing these challenges at the same time requires a coherent strategy that targets energy poverty and wealth creation in the poorest deciles, while reducing the emissions intensity of the sectors - notably transportation - of the Indian and global economies supporting increasing household consumption.
Keyword:
Household energy use
Carbon dioxide emissions
India
HDI
IHDS

期刊

Energy Research and Social Science 封面图
Energy Research and Social Science
IF:
7.4
论文数:
4.0K
被引数:
2.2W

机构

P
Princeton University
学者数:
2.1W
论文数: 2.3W
被引数: 5.1W
U
University of Queensland
学者数:
5.0W
论文数: 5.1W
被引数: 9.2W
引用论文

引用论文

err分享
err收藏
Institutionelle Diskriminierung
err
IF0
err2009-01-01
err0
errOAAI
errMechtild Gomolla; Frank-Olaf Radtke
err分享
err收藏
Cooking fuel use patterns in India: 1983-2000
err2005-05-01
err69
PREAI
errViswanathan, B; Kumar, KSK
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
CANADIAN CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF THE HIGH-RISK PREGNANCY STRESS SCALE
err1996-07-01
err0
PREAI
errCÉLINE GOULET; VIOLA POLOMENO; FRANÇOIS HAREL
err分享
err收藏
Energy requirements of households in Brazil
err2005-03-01
err156
PREAI
errCohen, C; Lenzen, M; Schaeffer, R
err分享
err收藏
A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan
errENERGY
IF9.4
err2006-02-01
err361
PREAI
errLenzen, M; Wier, M; Cohen, C; Hayami, H; Pachauri, S; Schaeffer, R
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容