.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Return
Carbon footprint of biostatic, targeted ornamental lighting and related cleaning service for sustainable conservation of architectural heritage
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
A
P
A
DOI：10.1016/j.culher.2026.04.002.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
Share.png){kind=icon}
Save
Abstract
En 中文
• CromaLux lighting and cleaning systems were evaluated in a case study. • The carbon footprint is 24% lower for CromaLux LEDs than for conventional white LEDs. • Reinforced-ethanol cleaning uses ∼ 20% less CO2-eq but is 22% more costly than Biotin. • CromaLux could halt biofouling and reduce carbon emissions by up to 16.83 kg CO2-eq. • CromaLux could yield annual savings of up to 3.64 tCO2-eq and €1269.91 at city level.
Keywords:
Biocides
Cultural heritage
Public lighting
Microalgae
Buildings and monuments
Sustainable development goals
AI Summary
Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.
Journal
IF:
3.3
Papers:
3.0K
Citations:
7.0K
Organization
Cited Papers