1
Return

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reclassification of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A COMPARE-TAVI 1 substudy

delete2026-06-12
delete0
delete
OA
AI
A
Alexandra Amalie Uglebjerg Pedersen *
A
Anders Lehman Dahl Pedersen
N
Nils Sofus Borg Mogensen
L
Lene Hüche Nielsen
H
Henrik Nissen
P
Philip Freeman
N
Nicolaj Hansson
J
Julia Ellert-Gregersen
T
Tomas Zaremba
B
Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
T
Troels Thim
E
Evald Høj Christiansen
C
Christian Juhl Terkelsen
W
Won Yong Kim
J
Jordi Sanchez Dahl
DOI:10.1016/j.jocmr.2026.102763delete
deleteOriginal
deleteShare
deleteSave
View PDF
Abstract

Abstract

En 中文
Aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a clinical concern. Echocardiography is routinely used to assess AR but relies on semiquantitative and operator-dependent measures, while cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) allows direct quantification of regurgitant flow. This study compared transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR in assessing AR after TAVI using standardized Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria.
Keywords:
aortic valve stenosis
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
aortic regurgitation
paravalvular leakage
cardiovascular magnetic resonance
phase-contrast imaging
AI Summary

AI Summary

Key information extracted from the uploaded paper, including a brief overview, abstract, background, key highlights, visual analysis, and future outlook.

Journal

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance cover
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
IF:
6.1
Papers:
2.3K
Citations:
6.9K

Organization

A
Aalborg University Hospital
Scholars:
3.7K
Papers: 3.3K
Citations: 3.8K
O
odense university hospital
Scholars:
7.1K
Papers: 6.0K
Citations: 93
A
aarhus university hospital
Scholars:
394
Papers: 171
Citations: 0
Cited Papers

Cited Papers

Citing Papers

Citing Papers