返回
Causal inference framework for generalizable safety effect estimates
DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.001.png)
摘要
En 中文
This study integrates a causal inference framework to the Empirical Bayes (EB) before-after method to develop generalizable safety effect estimates (i.e., crash modification factor (CMF)). The method considers approaches to estimate the average treatment effect for the treated (ATT), average treatment effect for the untreated (ATU), and average treatment effect (ATE). The current EB method is shown to estimate ATT while ATE is what is typically desired in traffic safety research. Modifications to the current ER method to estimate ATU and ATE are provided. The method is then applied to a dataset with a no-treatment scenario where the treatments were: 1) randomly selected and 2) selected based on crash history. Given the no-treatment outcome, it is known that the CMFs should have a value of 1 in order to be considered accurate. The standard negative binomial and mixed effects negative binomial regression models were applied in the analysis. It was found that, of the two regression methods, the ATE CMFs developed using the standard negative binomial were the most accurate. Finally, potential sources of bias in the EB method are discussed.
Keyword:
Empirical Bayes
Causal inference
Potential outcomes
Study design
Rubin's causal model
Average treatment effect
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
A
IF:
6.2
论文数:
7.6K
被引数:
3.2W
机构
引用论文
Cofilin-Induced Changes in F-Actin Detected via Cross-Linking with Benzophenone-4-maleimide
Biochemistry
IF0
The negative binomial-Lindley generalized linear model: Characteristics and application using crash data负二项式-Lindley广义线性模型: 使用碰撞数据的特征和应用

