arrow
返回

ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia

delete2012-09-05
delete1.6K
delete
OA
AI
S
Stephen G. Landt
G
Georgi K. Marinov
A
Anshul Kundaje
P
Pouya Kheradpour
F
Florencia Pauli
S
Serafim Batzoglou
B
B Bernstein
P
Peter J. Bickel
J
James B. Brown
P
Philip Cayting
Y
Yiwen Chen
G
Gilberto DeSalvo
C
Charles B. Epstein
K
Katherine Fisher-Aylor
G
Ghia Euskirchen
M
Mark Gerstein
J
Jason Gertz
A
Alexander J. Hartemink
M
Michael M. Hoffman
V
Vishwanath R. Iyer
Y
Youngsook L. Jung
S
Subhradip Karmakar
M
Manolis Kellis
P
Peter V. Kharchenko
Q
Qunhua Li
T
Tao Liu
X
X. Shirley Liu
L
Lijia Ma
A
Aleksandar Milosavljevic
R
R Myers
P
Peter J. Park
M
Michael J. Pazin
M
Marc D. Perry
D
Debasish Raha
T
Timothy E. Reddy
J
Joel Rozowsky
N
Noam Shoresh
A
Arend Sidow
M
Matthew Slattery
J
J Stamatoyannopoulos
M
Michael Tolstorukov
K
Kevin P. White
S
Simon Xi
P
Peggy Farnham *
J
Jason D. Lieb
B
B Wold
M
M Snyder
DOI:10.1101/gr.136184.111delete
delete原文链接
delete分享
delete收藏
查看原文
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has become a valuable and widely used approach for mapping the genomic location of transcription-factor binding and histone modifications in living cells. Despite its widespread use, there are considerable differences in how these experiments are conducted, how the results are scored and evaluated for quality, and how the data and metadata are archived for public use. These practices affect the quality and utility of any global ChIP experiment. Through our experience in performing CHIP-seq experiments, the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia have developed a set of working standards and guidelines for ChIP experiments that are updated routinely. The current guidelines address antibody validation, experimental replication, sequencing depth, data and metadata reporting, and data quality assessment. We discuss how ChIP quality, assessed in these ways, affects different uses of chip-seq data. All data sets used in the analysis have been deposited for public viewing and downloading at the ENCODE (http:/ / encodeproject.org/ENCODE/) and modENCODE (http:/ /www.modencode. org/) portals.
Keyword:
TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR-BINDING
GENOME-WIDE ANALYSIS
CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION
IDENTIFICATION
METHYLATIONS
ASSOCIATION
MACROPHAGE
EXPRESSION
ELEMENTS
REGIONS
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Genome Research 封面图
Genome Research
IF:
5.5
论文数:
5.6K
被引数:
4.3W

机构

C
California Institute of Technology
学者数:
2.9W
论文数: 2.5W
被引数: 4.9W
D
Duke University
学者数:
6.3W
论文数: 5.7W
被引数: 6.5W
H
Harvard University
学者数:
26.5W
论文数: 22.0W
被引数: 28.7W
U
university of southern california
学者数:
4.6W
论文数: 3.8W
被引数: 51
D
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
学者数:
1.5W
论文数: 9.6K
被引数: 3.8W
H
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
学者数:
1.6W
论文数: 1.4W
被引数: 36
U
university of north carolina
学者数:
7.4W
论文数: 6.5W
被引数: 93
U
University of California Berkeley
学者数:
3.5W
论文数: 2.8W
被引数: 11.3W
Y
Yale University
学者数:
6.5W
论文数: 6.0W
被引数: 10.0W
U
University of Washington
学者数:
8.0W
论文数: 7.0W
被引数: 12.5W
S
Stanford University
学者数:
9.6W
论文数: 8.2W
被引数: 17.0W
B
Broad Institute
学者数:
5.7K
论文数: 3.3K
被引数: 4.0W
H
HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
学者数:
724
论文数: 434
被引数: 2.3K
U
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
学者数:
3.9W
论文数: 3.1W
被引数: 46
学者 查看更多机构