.png){kind=icon}
返回
Claim Validation
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1257/aer.104.11.3725.png)
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Hume (1748) challenged the idea that a general claim (e.g., all swans are white) can be validated by empirical evidence, no matter how compelling. We examine this issue from the perspective of a tester who must accept or reject the forecasts of a potential expert. If experts can be skeptical about the validity of claims then they can evade rejection strategically. In contrast, if experts are required to conclude that claims backed by sufficient evidence are likely to be true, then they can be tested and rejected. These results provide an economic rationale for claim validation based on incentive problems.
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
11.6
论文数:
5.0K
被引数:
7.5W
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
分享收藏分享收藏
分享收藏
查看更多内容