.png){kind=icon}
返回
Clinical assessment
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135136.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Are clinical psychologists' assessment practices cost-effective? Are they scientifically sound? Are they fair and unbiased? Financial pressures from managed care interests, recent developments in the law, and multicultural issues are forcing the profession to confront these hard questions regarding accountability. Our review discusses the important changes that have begun to alter the field of personality assessment and describes recent research on clinical judgment and its implications for the future. We conclude that clinical psychology can adapt to future conditions by developing assessment strategies that are economical, scientifically sound, and culturally sensitive.
Keyword:
managed care
multicultural assessment
forensic assessment
clinical judgment
computerized assessment
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
IF:
29.4
论文数:
1.9K
被引数:
3.0W
机构
暂无机构信息
引用论文
分享收藏分享收藏Differences in muscle blood flow in upper and lower extremities of patients after correction of coarctation of the aorta..png)
Circulation
OAAI
CirculationIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Identification of Distinctive Patterns of USP19-Mediated Growth Regulation in Normal and Malignant CellsPLoS ONE
OAAI
PLoS ONEIF0
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容