arrow
返回

Coding Metaphors in Interaction: A Study Protocol and Reflection on Validity and Reliability Challenges

delete2023-03-31
delete6
delete
OA
AI
J
Jana Declercq *
L
Lotte van Poppel
DOI:10.1177/16094069231164608delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
With this study protocol, we present our approach to collaboratively coding metaphors in medical consultations, using the qualitative analysis software package ATLAS.ti. This project came with a number of challenges but also yielded a coded data set that was rich and versatile, and allowed for a wide array of analyses. We therefore believe it can be of interest to share the details of the process, to (1) provide an hands-on approach to qualitative, collaborative (metaphor) coding, and (2) contribute to our understanding and the advancement of qualitative methods in relation to coding metaphors, and coding more generally. The protocol can be of interest for researchers interested in collaborative qualitative coding, of metaphors or other (linguistic) units, using software. We specifically describe how we set up our initial coding system, and how we further developed it inductively; how we dealt with the fuzziness of metaphors; how we approach cleaning between coding rounds; how we divided work over and collaborated as a team of three coders with different but related cultural and linguistic backgrounds; how we structured our documentation and logbook. We then discuss how this set of guidelines complements the theoretical literature and more general guidelines on (metaphor) coding, and on reliability and validity in qualitative research. We will reflect on both a number of logistic and practical issues, as well as methodological and empirical challenges, and advantages and disadvantages of our approach.
Keyword:
Discourse analysis
ethnography
methods in qualitative inquiry
grounded theory
constructivist GT

期刊

I
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
IF:
3.8
论文数:
2.2K
被引数:
1.2W

机构

U
University of Groningen
学者数:
4.4W
论文数: 4.3W
被引数: 5.9W
引用论文

引用论文

Metaphor in organizational research: Context, modalities and implications for research introduction
err2008-01-01
err193
errOAAI
errCornelissen, Joep P.; Oswick, Cliff; Christensen, Lars Thoger; Phillips, Nelson
err分享
err收藏
err2020-11-01
err0
PREAI
err
err分享
err收藏
Is it worthwhile to treat peyronie disease?
err1980-07-01
err0
PREAI
errJoaquin G. Mira
err分享
err收藏
Survey of HIV care providers on management of HIV serodiscordant couples – assessment of attitudes, knowledge, and practices
err2014-05-30
err0
PREAI
errMatthew L. Scherer; Nataki C. Douglas; Bethlehem H. Churnet; Lisa C. Grossman; Melissa Kline; Michael T. Yin; Mark V. Sauer; Susan A. Olender
err分享
err收藏
err
IF0
err
err0
errOAAI
err
err分享
err收藏
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容