arrow
返回

Color difference thresholds for computer-simulated human Gingiva

delete2018-02-24
delete36
PRE
AI
M
María del Mar Pérez Gómez
R
Razvan Ghinea *
L
Luis Javier Herrera
C
Carrillo, F.
A
Ana María Ionescu
R
Rade D. Paravina
DOI:10.1111/jerd.12373delete
delete原文链接
delete原文求助
delete分享
delete收藏
摘要

摘要

En 中文
Objective: To determine 50:50% perceptibility threshold (PT) and 50:50% acceptability threshold (AT) for computer-simulated samples of human gingiva using CIEDE2000 and CIELAB color difference formulas. Materials and Methods: Each of the 60 pairs of simulated human gingiva was displayed on a calibrated monitor, together with three pairs of upper central incisors of different lightness. The color of gingiva left and right from the midline was compared. A total of 30 observers (15 dentists, 15 laypersons) participated in the study. CIEDE2000 and CIELAB formulas were used to calculate the thresholds and a Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Fuzzy Approximation model was used as fitting procedure. Paired t-test (alpha = 0.05) was used in evaluation of statistical significance of differences. Results: The PT and AT for CIEDE2000 and 95% confidence intervals were 1.1 [0.4, 1.7] and 2.8 [1.8, 4.0], respectively. Corresponding CIELAB values were 1.7 [0.2, 2.6] and 3.7 [2.1, 5.7]. Significant differences (P < .01) were recorded between PT and AT, between the corresponding threshold values in CIEDE2000 and CIELAB formulas as well as between dentists and laypersons. Conclusions: The difference between the perceptibility and acceptability threshold for gingiva was statistically significant in both CIEDE2000 and CIELAB. The same was true for differences between the corresponding thresholds using two color difference formulas, and between dentists and laypersons. Visual thresholds of human gingiva were not dependent upon lightness of adjacent teeth. Overall, CIEDE2000 color difference formula provided better fit than CIELAB formula in the evaluation of color difference thresholds of human gingiva. Clinical Significance: The data on visual thresholds for healthy human gingiva can be used as quality control tool/guide for selection and evaluation of dental materials, interpretation of color-related findings in clinical dentistry and research, and for standardization in dentistry. It is of particular value that this study was designed based on in-vivo color evaluation of healthy keratinized gingiva of subjects of different ethnicities, age groups, and gender.
Keyword:
color difference
human gingiva
thresholds
AI总结

AI总结

对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取,主要内容包括:简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。

期刊

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 封面图
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
IF:
4.1
论文数:
2.0K
被引数:
5.0K

机构

U
university of texas system
学者数:
18.5W
论文数: 15.6W
被引数: 210
U
University of Granada
学者数:
2.3W
论文数: 1.9W
被引数: 24
引用论文

引用论文

Procedure for loading diamond cells with high-pressure gas
err1980-07-01
err0
PREAI
errR. L. Mills; D. H. Liebenberg; J. C. Bronson; L. C. Schmidt
err分享
err收藏
Designing visually optimal shade guides
err2004-10-01
err77
PREAI
errAnaloui, M; Papkosta, E; Cochran, M; Matis, B
err分享
err收藏
Checkerboard Self-Patterning of an Ionic Liquid Film on Mercury
err2011-05-10
err0
errOAAI
errL. Tamam; B. M. Ocko; H. Reichert; M. Deutsch
err分享
err收藏
Color Difference Thresholds in Dentistry牙科中的色差阈值
err2015-04-17
err899
PREAI
errParavina, Rade D.; Ghinea, Razvan; Herrera, Luis J.; Bona, Alvaro D.; Igiel, Christopher; Linninger, Mercedes; Sakai, Maiko; Takahashi, Hidekazu; Tashkandi, Esam; del Mar Perez, Maria
err分享
err收藏
Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition
err2007-09-01
err102
errOAAI
errBayindir, Funda; Kuo, Shanglun; Johnston, William M.; Wee, Alvin G.
err分享
err收藏
学者 查看更多内容