.png){kind=icon}
返回
Commodity Investing
.png){kind=icon}
PRE
AI
DOI：10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101716.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
This article reviews the literature on commodities from the perspective of an investor. We re-examine some of the early papers in the literature using recent data and find that the empirical support for the theory of normal backwardation as an explanation for the commodity risk premium is weak and that the evidence is more consistent with storage decisions. We then review the behavior of the main participants in the commodity futures markets with a particular focus on their impact on prices. Although there is continued disagreement in the literature about the role of speculative activity, our results show that money managers are generally momentum (positive feedback) traders, while producers are net short and contrarian (negative feedback) traders. There is less evidence that index traders and swap dealers trade based on past futures returns.
Keyword:
commodity futures
theory of storage
theory of normal backwardation
risk premium
trader positions
AI总结
对已上传原文的论文进行重点信息的提取，主要内容包括：简要概述、研究摘要、背景介绍、关键亮点、图文解析、展望与总结。
期刊
A
IF:
5.2
论文数:
0
被引数:
0
机构
引用论文
.png){kind=icon}
Tail Event Driven ASset allocation: evidence from equity and mutual funds’ markets尾部事件驱动的资产配置: 来自股票和共同基金市场的证据
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容