.png){kind=icon}
返回
Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Streamflow Forecasting
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3351754.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Deep learning excels at managing spatial and temporal time series with variable patterns for streamflow forecasting, but traditional machine learning algorithms may struggle with complicated data, including non-linear and multidimensional complexity. Empirical heterogeneity within watersheds and limitations inherent to each estimation methodology pose challenges in effectively measuring and appraising hydrological statistical frameworks of spatial and temporal variables. This study emphasizes streamflow forecasting in the region of Johor, a coastal state in Peninsular Malaysia, utilizing a 28-year streamflow-pattern dataset from Malaysia's Department of Irrigation and Drainage for the Johor River and its tropical rainforest environment. For this dataset, wavelet transformation significantly improves the resolution of lag noise when historical streamflow data are used as lagged input variables, producing a 6% reduction in the root-mean-square error. A comparative analysis of convolutional neural networks and artificial neural networks reveals these models' distinct behavioral patterns. Convolutional neural networks exhibit lower stochasticity than artificial neural networks when dealing with complex time series data and with data transformed into a format suitable for modeling. However, convolutional neural networks may suffer from overfitting, particularly in cases in which the structure of the time series is overly simplified. Using Bayesian neural networks, we modeled network weights and biases as probability distributions to assess aleatoric and epistemic variability, employing Markov chain Monte Carlo and bootstrap resampling techniques. This modeling allowed us to quantify uncertainty, providing confidence intervals and metrics for a robust quantitative assessment of model prediction variability.
Keyword:
Artificial neural network
deep learning convolutional neural network
Bayesian statistic
streamflow
time series
uncertainty analysis
期刊
IF:
3.6
论文数:
9.8W
被引数:
29.4W
机构
引用论文
Long lead-time daily and monthly streamflow forecasting using machine learning methods使用机器学习方法进行长时间的每日和每月流量预测.png)
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGYIF6.3
PREAI
分享收藏Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges了解基于自然的解决方案应对气候变化和其他全球挑战的价值和局限性
OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Image classification with deep learning in the presence of noisy labels: A survey在存在噪声标签的情况下使用深度学习进行图像分类: 一项调查OAAI
OAAI分享收藏Uncertainty quantification of granular computing-neural network model for prediction of pollutant longitudinal dispersion coefficient in aquatic streamsSCIENTIFIC REPORTSOAAI
SCIENTIFIC REPORTSIF3.9
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏Development and hydrometeorological evaluation of a new stochastic daily rainfall model: Coupling Markov chain with rainfall event modelJOURNAL OF HYDROLOGYOAAI
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGYIF6.3
OAAI分享收藏
查看更多内容