.png){kind=icon}
返回
Comparative analysis of machine learning methods for active flow control
.png){kind=icon}
OA
AI
DOI：10.1017/jfm.2023.76.png)
.png){kind=icon}
原文求助.png){kind=icon}
分享.png){kind=icon}
收藏
摘要
En 中文
Machine learning frameworks such as genetic programming and reinforcement learning (RL) are gaining popularity in flow control. This work presents a comparative analysis of the two, benchmarking some of their most representative algorithms against global optimization techniques such as Bayesian optimization and Lipschitz global optimization. First, we review the general framework of the model-free control problem, bringing together all methods as black-box optimization problems. Then, we test the control algorithms on three test cases. These are (1) the stabilization of a nonlinear dynamical system featuring frequency cross-talk, (2) the wave cancellation from a Burgers' flow and (3) the drag reduction in a cylinder wake flow. We present a comprehensive comparison to illustrate their differences in exploration versus exploitation and their balance between model capacity' in the control law definition versus required complexity'. Indeed, we discovered that previous RL control attempts of controlling the cylinder wake were performing linear control and that the wide observation space was limiting their performances. We believe that such a comparison paves the way towards the hybridization of the various methods, and we offer some perspective on their future development in the literature of flow control problems.
Keyword:
flow control
期刊
IF:
3.9
论文数:
2.0W
被引数:
9.4W
机构
引用论文
Engaging race and racism for socially just intergroup relations: The impact of intergroup dialogue on college campuses in the United States探讨种族与种族主义以实现社会公正的群际关系：群际对话对美国大学校园的影响
PREAI
分享收藏分享收藏Applying deep reinforcement learning to active flow control in weakly turbulent conditions.png)
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
OAAI
PHYSICS OF FLUIDSIF4.3
OAAI分享收藏分享收藏
查看更多内容